Archive for the ‘Comedic’ Category

The Trinity: Asexual Reproduction

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

The Holy Trinity is one of the concepts that people often struggle with.  How can three people be the same person and both the father and son?  Well, thankfully biology has given us an answer to this question.   God reproduces asexually.   It makes sense.  They would be clones of God, thus technically still God, and yet separate entities.   God even has a history of using asexual reproduction.  Eve was made asexually by cloning Adam using a rib.  So we have more proof, based on the assumption that man is made in God’s image, that God is an asexually reproducing being.

The Publishing Industry Delusion

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

Reasons why British comedy is better:  The U.S. has Dane Cook, the Brits have this…

It’s quite the commentary on the publishing industry at the moment.

(via skepchick)

Shit Our Founding Fathers Said

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

                In light of yesterday’s post I’ve developed yet another book idea that I’ll never get around to, but should.  Shit Our Founding Fathers Said: intrepid time travelers, with the promise of massive orgies with even better looking women than the 18th century, have lured our founding fathers to the present to see just what they would actually think about the world today.   Take this excerpt from ole T.J.

                Now, I know I might have mentioned something about the right of men to overthrow their government, but let’s have some context here.  I was trying to justify revolting against Britain. Yes, there are some grand ideas there, but you’ve got to realize that we were not very big fans of paying for wars instigated on our behalf or to having no say in how we did so.  The truth lies somewhere in that. I can clearly tell that, as a society, Americans have gotten over any and all objections to war spending on their behalf. 

                Back to my point though, when I said right of men to overthrow their government I was not speaking about when government officials elected by a majority did something you didn’t like.  And you call yourselves oppressed; I look at these rallies—which you are allowed to have need I remind you—and I see a mass of white male landowners, so clearly you’ve been able to vote and participate in the political process unhindered.  I assume you took care of that slavery thing since I don’t see any negroes about.  Good job there, if indeed you did so.

                Can you even begin to imagine the places this country wouldn’t have gone if we had behaved like this when we disagreed with Washington and Adams?  You would likely either be speaking French or the King’s right now. I believe that, if I am understanding the language correctly, you have a modern day idiom for the point I am trying to make right now.  Back in my day we walked to school, uphill, both ways, in the snow.  

T.J.

Of course, as far as projects go this would benefit greatly from a vast amount of linguistic and historical research into the founding fathers, which, I sadly do not have time to do at the moment; though, on the linguistic side, I do want to look into the British commoner response to the revolution.  So if I do end up doing that project (which I won’t because I don’t have access to the right archives readily available) some of the language clears up a little.

Dear Rick Perry

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Your set designer, you may want to get a new one. 

Yellow star on a red background, seriously?  You do know that you make a living calling everything the democrats do “socialism, communism, and/or Marxism,” right? 

(via nyt)

Bush v Rove

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

                In terms of sentences you’d never thought you’d have the pleasure to laugh at, this wonderful Guardian article on Karl Rove’s bookclub provided this gem:

And [Karl] has always been keen to show his credentials as a reader, writing in the Wall Street Journal back in 2008 about the reading contests he used to undertake with Bush, when the pair would race to complete the greatest number of books in a year.

Which, I suppose, would be one of the easiest competitions in the world to win.  Of course, that’s not really true, and say what you will about how dumb Bush is and what a terrible president he made—I’m not one to disagree there—but actually believing he hardly ever picked up a book is a little shortsighted.  Most educated people do tend to read books.  It just happens.  Books go everywhere; t.v. doesn’t, especially when the Internet didn’t exist in homes until you were nearly forty.   While the books being read are likely right-wing narratives that happen to reinforce the conservative selection bias, at the very least they’re promoting reading.  At the very least I’d rather be up against somebody making a bad argument based on selective evidence than somebody with no argument at all.  The former is actually likely to give some consideration to your point of view and be accepting of the fact that he or she could be at least partially wrong.    That being said, they could still be a cold-hearted bastard who doesn’t give a shit as long as it helps them make a short-term profit, but then again, some people actually do think the 1950’s were the golden age of America and that trying to return there is better for the common good.

Warning: this site may contain trace amounts of logic, reason, and factual evidence.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.


One Hour Parking Show is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).